Legal Opinion

City of Vincennes v. Reuhl

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1996No. 42A01-9607-CV-216PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, appellant-defendant the City of Vincennes appeals the trial court's denial of its motion for summary judgment on both the complaint of appellee plaintiff Virginia Reuh] and the cross-claim of appellee-defendant Environmental Management Corporation (EMC). Specifically, Vin-cennes claims the trial court made the following errors: 1) failing to find that Vincennes was immune from liability and 2) failing to find that Vincennes was entitled to summary judgment on EMC's eross-claim for indemnity.

FACTS

The facts relevant to this interlocutory appeal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bagley v. Insight Communications Co., LPIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Indiana State Board of Dental Examiners v. JuddIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. O'NEAL v. ThroopIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Shand Mining, Inc. v. Clay County Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. City of Indianapolis v. CauleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rush v. Elkhart County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Bulldog Battery Corp. v. Pica Investments, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Bartholomew County v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Abigail Elizabeth Freeman Jacks, a minor, by next friends Jennifer Jacks and William Scott Freeman, and Jennifer Jacks, and Jennifer Edwards v. Tipton Community School CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Indiana Department of Transportation v. HowardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API