Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 29, 1958No. 10,604PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his lawyer previously represented the two principal witnesses for the prosecution. Among other things he alleges that one of the Government witnesses who was a junior drill instructor in his platoon unqualifiedly testified in his own earlier trial that he had never received any money or contribution from the recruits in the platoon. However, at the accused’s trial he testified that with the knowledge of the accused, who was the senior drill instructor, he had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LovettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. ThorntonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. EskridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. ForwerckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  2. United States v. CollierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. KoneskiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
  5. United States v. CahillU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API