Legal Opinion

Gorman Anderson Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 27, 1955No. C. D. 1674PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:.

Merchandise described in the record as Mordax horseshoe studs was classified by the collector of customs as articles of metal, not specially provided for, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 22K per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802).

It is the contention of the plaintiffs that the commodity should be classified in the provision for “* * * studs, * * * lathed, machined, or brightened,” and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. OberleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. WakemCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fastening Devices, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Alltransport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. S.I. Stud, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API