Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Flanagan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 25, 1987No. C3-87-646PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment dismissing appellant’s claims on the grounds of collateral estoppel and res judi-cata. Appellant previously obtained a default judgment against respondent regarding his failure to pay a promissory note. The trial court determined appellant’s subsequent claims were barred because certain claims were identical to her previous claims and others arose from the same transaction. Appellant claims the trial court erred ■because the court improperly (1) applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel to certain claims, (2) determined her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Anderson v. Werner Continental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Roseberg v. SteenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Pederson v. Rose Cooperative Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re DEF Investments, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  2. Angus v. Wald (In Re Wald)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  3. North Tel, Inc. v. Brandl (In Re Brandl)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  4. Kriescher v. Gibson (In re Gibson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
  5. Diana Delgado v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API