Legal Opinion
Bryson v. Bryson
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1923No. Civ. No. 4169PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action brought under section 315 of the Civil Code to declare illegal and void the election of Isaac H. Bryson and Joseph S. Bryson as directors of the Bryson Estate Company.
Considering the fact that Joseph S. Bryson is one of the plaintiffs in the action and is a respondent herein, the appeal need be considered only with reference to the election of Isaac PI. Bryson.
In the month of May, 1907, the Bryson Estate Company was organized as a corporation with a capital stock of $600,000, divided into 60,000 shares of the par value of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seal of Gold Mining Co. v. SlaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Murphy v. DelanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
- Elger v. BoyleNew York Supreme Court · 1910
- Rozecrans Gold Mining Co. v. MoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Byington v. PiazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re United Air Lines, Inc., Debtor. U.S. Bank National Association, Cross-Appellee v. United Air Lines, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Stanton v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Valley National Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1943
- Central Arizona Light & Power Co. v. MeekArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Estate of GouletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.