Legal Opinion

Borsuk v. Superior Court

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided July 22, 2015No. BS154988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

B. JOHNSON, J.

In an action for unlawful detainer, petitioner Sofia Borsuk filed a motion to quash service of summons and complaint asserting that she was not properly served with the three-day notice to pay rent or quit in a manner prescribed by law. In her supporting declaration, petitioner claimed that the three-day notice was left on the ground, in an unmarked envelope, on the side of petitioner’s apartment unit. The respondent court denied petitioner’s motion as an unsuccessful “challenge to the sufficiency of the complaint.” Petitioner then filed a petition for writ of mandate,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Delta Imports, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Summers v. McClanahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. City of Clovis v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Lebel v. MaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Parsons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Borsuk v. Appellate Division of Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API