United States v. Marc Rosenthal
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
This appeal does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence for charged widespread corruption involving a lawyer, a state judge, and a former state legislator. Instead, the lawyer, Marc Garrett Rosen-thal, claims he is entitled to a new trial due to procedural errors, such as in obtaining wiretap evidence. He was found guilty by a jury of: racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (count one); five counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 2 (counts two…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. OnyeriCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. LamartiniereCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Sharon IglehartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Darryl Cox v. Cresco Capital, Inc.; et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Mieco, L.L.C. v. PioneerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.