Legal Opinion

United States v. Marc Rosenthal

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 14, 2015No. 13-41329PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

This appeal does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence for charged widespread corruption involving a lawyer, a state judge, and a former state legislator. Instead, the lawyer, Marc Garrett Rosen-thal, claims he is entitled to a new trial due to procedural errors, such as in obtaining wiretap evidence. He was found guilty by a jury of: racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (count one); five counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 2 (counts two…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. OnyeriCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. LamartiniereCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Sharon IglehartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. Darryl Cox v. Cresco Capital, Inc.; et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
  5. Mieco, L.L.C. v. PioneerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API