Darryl Cox v. Cresco Capital, Inc.; et al.

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Darryl Cox, Case No. 2:25-cv-02022-CDS-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Cresco Capital, Inc.; et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested 12 authority to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff also submitted a complaint (ECF 13 No. 1-1) and two amended complaints (ECF Nos. 6, 7). Because the Court finds that Plaintiff’s 14 application is complete, it grants the application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court screens 15 Plaintiff’s most recent amended…