Weinreb v. Strauss
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff sued two defendants for $3,000 “for services rendered * * * in obtaining a suitable site for their place of business.” A verdict was directed for one defendant and he is not concerned in this appeal. As to the other defendant, plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that said defendant was interested in purchasing a retail liquor business, that he was shown several such businesses by plaintiff but none was found suitable to his needs, that de fendant urged plaintiff to continue to look for a suitable place, saying: “All you have got to do is to get me a place, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McClory v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- McSweeney v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Crusade v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heslop v. DieudonneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Warner Corporation v. Magazine Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- National Savings & Trust Company, as Successor Trustee for the Alonzo Bliss Properties v. B. Franklin KahnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Joseph M. Silverman, Inc. v. HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985