Legal Opinion

McClory v. Schneider

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 8, 1932No. 3744PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

The appellee, Schneider, claiming commission as a broker, sued appellant, McClory, and nine other individuals to recover the sum of $29,300. Later he filed a first "amended original petition in which he abandoned his suit against all of the defendants except the appellant, McClory, who he alleged was a stockholder, officer, and director of certain corporations, viz. Pampa Pipe Line Company, Pampa Refining Company, and Grayco Gasoline Company; that he employed plaintiff as broker to find a purchaser for the properties and assets of the refining and pipe line companies, who would be ready,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dean v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Continental Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Moroney v. MoroneyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Presnall v. Stockyards Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Automobile Mortgage Co. v. AyubTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tenneco Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Reid Road Municipal Utility District No. 2 v. Speedy Stop Food Stores, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Colbert v. Dallas Joint Stock Land BankTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Engel v. Teleprompter Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API