Legal Opinion

People v. Hunter

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1986No. A030731PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANNELL, J.

I. Introduction

Following a remand for resentencing pursuant to People v. Belmontes (1983) 34 Cal.3d 335 [193 Cal.Rptr. 882, 667 P.2d 686], appellant Joseph Scott Hunter again appeals. Appellant contends that the trial judge erred when he (1) personally passed on the motion to disqualify him; (2) failed to consider a full and complete supplemental sentencing report; and (3) resentenced appellant without complying with Belmontes and other required sentencing procedures.

II. Statement of the Case

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of seven sexual offenses, based on two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. WychockiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. People v. RojasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. RojasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API