People v. Pierce
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
I. Introduction
In this case we hold that Judge R. Bryan Jamar erred by failing to state reasons for imposing upper terms of imprisonment, and we remand the cause for resentencing by another judge because of Judge Jamar’s persistent failure or inability to perform the fundamental duty of a sentencing court to state reasons for its sentencing choices.
II. Background
Marty Richard Pierce pleaded guilty to four counts of sale of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379). Judge Jamar imposed the upper term of four years for one count, a consecutive subordinate one-year term for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Catchpole v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. CalvertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. WychockiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Vidano CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016