Legal Opinion

People v. Pierce

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1995No. A069479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. Introduction

In this case we hold that Judge R. Bryan Jamar erred by failing to state reasons for imposing upper terms of imprisonment, and we remand the cause for resentencing by another judge because of Judge Jamar’s persistent failure or inability to perform the fundamental duty of a sentencing court to state reasons for its sentencing choices.

II. Background

Marty Richard Pierce pleaded guilty to four counts of sale of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379). Judge Jamar imposed the upper term of four years for one count, a consecutive subordinate one-year term for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Catchpole v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. People v. CalvertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. People v. WychockiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Vidano CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API