Legal Opinion

Rose v. Beller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 10, 1925No. 14072PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This was an action in replevin brought by th^ plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against the defendant in error, as defendant, in the trial court. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in ¡the lower court.

The action was for the possession of a corn and cotton crop' grown upon lands leased by th^ plaintiff to one W. F. Padgett and one C. F. Padgett for the year 1920.

The plaintiff, in his petition, alleged that the. defendant, J. B. Beller, purchased from said Padgetts the crops grown on said land for the year 1920 and wrongiuRy detained from the plaintiff the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colonna v. Eiseman Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. VosburgSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Southwest Stone Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Colby v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Smith v. BlueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API