Legal Opinion
Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 11, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-5585PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLITAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”) is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey. Merck’s principal place of business is at 126 Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, New Jersey. Defendant, Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (“Biocraft”) is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Biocraft’s principal place of business is at 92 Route 46, Elmwood Park, New Jersey. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). The parties hereto stipulate that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989