Fassett v. Nascimiento
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DEASY, J., pro tem.
On the first day of August, 1928, a little after 3 o’clock in the afternoon, respondents, who are husband and wife, were proceeding in a general south erly direction on the highway a short distance south of Coyote, in Santa Clara County, in an Overland sedan owned by them and being driven by respondent Harry Fassett. A Ford car, driven by one J. K. Rideout, passed respondents’ car on its left and going in a southerly direction. Just prior to such passing, respondents observed a Dodge coupe coming toward their car in a northerly direction. When first seen the Dodge ear was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meek v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Easton v. United Trade Sch. Contracting Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Anstead v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Driscoll v. California Street Cable RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Happoldt v. Guardian Life Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Sebrell v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Finley v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Purcell v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.