Legal Opinion

Sebrell v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1948No. L. A. 20433PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for defendant in an action for damages for injuries to person and property sustained in a collision between her automobile and a streetcar owned by defendant. Plaintiff’s automobile, proceeding south on New Hampshire Avenue in Los Angeles, and defendant’s streetcar, proceeding west on Sixth Street, collided at the intersection. A boulevard stop sign on the northwest corner of the intersection of the two streets requires southbound vehicles on New Hampshire Avenue to stop before crossing Sixth Street. There are no stop signs on Sixth…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Soda v. MarriottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Chidester v. Consol. People's Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Simmons v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Fassett v. NascimientoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bakity v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Valdez v. J. D. Diffenbaugh Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Longway v. McCallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Arno v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Carlson v. ShewalterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API