Carpel v. Saget Studios, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ARTSDALEN, District Judge.
This is a motion for summary judgment by defendant, Saget Studios, Inc., who contends that as a matter of law the plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim could not result in damages of $10,000 and, thus, this suit is not within the monetary jurisdictional limits of the federal court. This motion is granted.
The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that the defendant contracted with them to take black and white photographs of their wedding for $110 but that those photographs were never delivered because of the negligence and carelessness of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thelma M. Wade, as Administratrix of the Estate of Russell L. Smith, Deceased v. Dan Rogala, Doing Business as Rogala FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Keystone Diesel E. Co., Inc. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Emerman v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Burton v. Artery CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- MDB v. Punxsutawney Christian Sch.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Rittenhouse Regency Affiliates v. PassenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.