Legal Opinion

Keystone Diesel E. Co., Inc. v. Irwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1963No. Appeal, 36PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below striking off a counterclaim filed in an action of assumpsit.

The plaintiff, Keystone Diesel Engine Company, Inc. (Keystone), is a dealer in diesel engines, and the defendant, Floyd T. Irwin (Irwin), operates tractor-trailers as a contract carrier. Sometime prior to July 1960, Keystone sold Irwin a diesel engine for approximately $3000 which was subsequently installed in a tractor. The engine did not function properly and the plaintiff Keystone performed certain modifications and repairs to the engine at its own…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Adams v. SpeckmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Wolstenholme, Inc. v. Jos. Randall Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. MacChia v. MegowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Adams v. J. I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  4. Beal v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
  5. Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API