Legal Opinion

McGilbry v. State ex rel. Eyman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 21, 1967No. 2 CA-HC 57PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Judge.

This case is before us on an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The applicant, Tommy Okawana McGilbry, was tried by a jury and found guilty on two counts, illegal sale of a narcotic drug, a felony, (counts II and IV). On May 21, 1962, petitioner was duly sentenced to the Arizona State Prison, where he is now incarcerated. The judgment of guilt and sentence read, in part, as follows:

“IT IS THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF THE COURT, that the defendant be incarcerated and imprisoned in the State Penitentiary at Florence, Arizona for a term of not less than Five (5) nor more…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Puccinelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  2. State v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Pina v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Biddle v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  5. Hogan v. HillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bidgood v. State ex rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  2. Valenzuela v. State Ex Rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. In MATTER OF McGILBRYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Valenzuela v. State ex rel. EymanArizona Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API