Legal Opinion
Kathleen McCollester Etc. v. The City of Keene, New Hampshire
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 11, 1982No. 81-1427PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, Senior District Judge.
This appeal from a judgment declaring, in effect, that the juvenile curfew ordinance of the City of Keene on its face violates the Fourteenth Amendment raises the question whether the plaintiff alleged such a realistic danger of sustaining a direct injury from defendants’ enforcement of the ordinance as to create a “case or controversy” within Article III of the United States. Constitution.
New Hampshire R.S.A. 31:43-a authorized the City of Keene, by action of its City Council, to adopt the substantive provisions set forth in R.S.A. 31:43-c and the penal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re the Justices of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, in Re Colegio De Abogados De Puerto Rico, and Fundacion Colegio De AbogadosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- National Council for Improved Health v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Waters v. BarryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.