Sullivan Mining Co. v. Aschenbach
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
The sole question for decision is of the meaning of the term “accident” as it is used in the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Idaho (Idaho Compiled Statutes 1919, § 6213 et seq.). If under any reasonable view of the evidence the injury for which plaintiff below (appellee here) sued and recovered was not “accidental” within such statutory meaning, appellant concedes the judgment should be affirmed; otherwise it should be reversed and the action dismissed on the ground that the *2courts are without jurisdiction of the subject-matter.
Plaintiff’s injury was incurred while he…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- McNeil v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Carroll v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Tintic Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Grain Handling Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Webb v. New Mexico Pub. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Matter of Harman v. Republic Aviation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Matter of MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Cannella v. Gulf Refining Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.