Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. Douglas

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 16, 2015No. CV-14-1095Published

1DissentRobert J. Gladwin, Chief Judge

The majority finds merit in appellants’ argument that, even if we affirm the finding that the summons was defective and, thus, dismissal was proper, the circuit court erred in entering a subsequent order dismissing |1fiwith prejudice. I disagree that service was completed, albeit improperly, and that precedent allows appellants to refile the complaint and obtain proper service within, one year of the order of dismissal pursuant to Rettig v. Ballard, 2009 Ark. 629, 362 S.W.3d 260. Accordingly, I dissent.

In David Newbern & John J. Watkins, Arkansas Civil Practice and Procedure § 5.10 (4th ed.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rettig v. BallardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Clouse v. Ngau Van TuCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Valley v. Helena National BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Cagle v. TerwilligerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API