Legal Opinion
Cagle v. Terwilliger
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided March 18, 2015No. CV-14-721PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Virden, Judge
| iAppellants Russell and Geneva Cagle assert that though they failed to perfect service on appellee Jeffrey Terwilliger, they should have been allowed to take advantage of Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-56-126, the savings statute, because they were defrauded into believing service was not necessary. The circuit court dismissed the case with prejudice. We affirm.
Russell and Geneva Cagle were involved in a car accident with Jeffrey Terwilliger on September 4, 2010, and sustained injuries from the collision. The Cagles had until September 4, 2013, to file a complaint against Terwilliger…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tucker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Carruth v. Design Interiors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Rettig v. BallardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Tontitown v. First Security BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SkenderCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Jones v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Joseph Lucas, an Individual; Glen Lucas, an Individual; Robert Lucas, an Individual; Barbara Johnson, an Individual; Thomas Lucas, an Individual; And David Abbott, an Individual v. Washington County; Pamela Vitko, as Personal Representative and on Behalf of the Laura Lee Broderick Estate; Cecily Lennard Lucas, as Personal Representative and on Behalf of the John P. Lucas Estate; And Victoria GilbertieCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Jones v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.