Legal Opinion

Clouse v. Ngau Van Tu

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 6, 2008No. CA 07-586PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D.p. Marshall Jr., Judge.

This case arises at the three-way intersection of a service problem, the statute of limitations, and the terms of the dismissal. The question presented is whether the circuit court should have dismissed Ngau Van Tu’s lawsuit against his former chiropractor, Dr. Lance Clouse, with prejudice or without prejudice. As Dr. Clouse contends, our review is de novo because this case turns on court rules and precedents about commencement, an issue of law. We conclude that Tu commenced his case by completing timely but defective service of his complaint and summons. As the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Lyons v. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. McCoy v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Green v. WigginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mark Barner v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. McCoy v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. City of Tontitown v. First Security BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Adams v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. David Thomas and Cynthia Parker v. Adam Gray Amanda Cox And Dominique BellesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API