Legal Opinion
Smith v. Bounds
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided April 10, 1986No. Civ. 3052, 4277, 790PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DUPREE, District Judge.
This action is before the court for a determination of which of the parties’ plans for providing North Carolina’s indigent inmates with the assistance of counsel should be adopted by the court. Plaintiffs have submitted two alternative plans, each providing that defendants would contract with Legal Services of North Carolina, Inc. (LSNC) to provide legal services to inmates. The major difference between plaintiffs’ two proposals involves the number of attorneys and proposed budgets. Plaintiffs’ initial proposal, filed July 3, 1985, would provide for twenty-three…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Younger v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Knop v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Smith v. BoundsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Hadix v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Smith v. BoundsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Gary Knop, Cross-Appellants v. Perry M. Johnson, Cross-Appellees. Everett Hadix v. Perry M. Johnson, Individually and as Director of the Michigan Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.