Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Longley

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1883No. 1146PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Washoe County. The facts are stated in the opinion. I. Property to be taxable must be abiding within the limits of a state or county; must be incorporated with the wealth of the state or county.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Leonard, J.:

Plaintiff is a resident of Hamilton county, state of Ohio, where he pays and has heretofore continually and uniformly paid taxes upon the property hereinafter mentioned, in July, 1882, he was, and for a long time prior thereto had been, the owner of a circus and menagerie. In the month mentioned he was traveling and exhibiting his said circus and menagerie, transporting the same on the cars of the Union Pacific and Central Pacific Railways, from Omaha, Nebraska, to the town of Reno, in this state, where he remained and exhibited one day. He also exhibited in other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conley v. ChedicNevada Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Barnes v. WoodburyNevada Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, By, Etc. v. Union Pacific R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Ice Capades, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Nevada-California Power Co. v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1916
  4. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. LynchUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  5. George M. Brewster & Son, Inc. v. BOR. OF BOGOTANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API