Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, By, Etc. v. Union Pacific R. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 7, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

The four above styled cases were begun by the Commonwealth of Kentucky through its revenue agent against' the respective appellees herein in the county court of Jefferson county. They are four of a large number of suits begun at the same time against various nonresident railroad companies who own or lease no tracks and operate no lines within this Commonwealth. The purpose of these suits was, first, to have assessed for taxation, as omitted property for the years set out in the respective statements, freight cars of these foreign railroads which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Case of the State Tax on Foreign-Held Bonds. Railroad Company v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Fargo v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Dewey v. Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brock & Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Reeves v. Island Creek Fuel & Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  3. Reeves v. Island Creek Fuel & Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
  4. State Tax Commission v. Central Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Commonwealth v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API