Legal Opinion
George M. Brewster & Son, Inc. v. BOR. OF BOGOTA
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 3, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.J. Super. 487 (1952)
90 A.2d 58
GEORGE M. BREWSTER & SON, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BOROUGH OF BOGOTA AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND TOWNSHIP OF WESTAMPTON AND TOWNSHIP OF MOUNT LAUREL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 26, 1952.
Decided July 3, 1952.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.
Mr. Robert W. Criscuolo argued the cause for appellant Township of Westampton (Mr. Bayard Allen, attorney; Messrs. Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, of counsel).
Mr. Benjamin Marmer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hays v. the Pacific Mail Steam-Ship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Ayer & Lord Co. v. Commonwealth of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- People ex rel. Aylett v. LangdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Brock & Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Commonwealth v. Amer. Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Mesa Leasing Ltd. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Dennis v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Ace Construction Co. v. Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Bogota v. Brewster Equip. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964