Legal Opinion

Rooney v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1995No. SC S42105; SC S42107Published

(Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)

1Opinion of the Court

902 P.2d 1183 (1995)

322 Or. 90

Daniel A. ROONEY and Julie Davis, Petitioners,

v.

Theodore KULONGOSKI, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Respondent.

Lon T. MABON and Scott D. Lively, Petitioners,

v.

Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, Respondent.

SC S42105, S42107.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted May 11, 1995.

Decided September 28, 1995.

Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, waived oral argument and filed the petition for petitioners Daniel A. Rooney and Julie Davis.

Gordon Lincoln Cummings, Keizer, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mabon v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rooney v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 21)Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Mabon v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API