Legal Opinion

Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Box

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1891No. 7092PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARR, Judge, Section A.

The plaintiff brought this suit in the court below, and recovered damages of the defendant company on account of personal injuries to his wife, alleged by him to have been inflicted as the 'direct consequence of the "negligent and wanton” acts of the engineer or other employes in charge of the defendant’s train of cars "in blowing and continuing to blow the whistle of the engine” attached to said train, "loud and shrill,” and "when there was no reasonable excuse, occasion, or necessity for blowing said whistle,” whereby the horses to the wagon in which plaintiff’s wife…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. T. & P. R'y Co. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. H. & T. C. Ry. Co. v. CarsonTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Honea v. ArledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. BeltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WagleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. PartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API