T. & P. R'y Co. v. Chapman
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. R. R. Gaines. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Chief Justice.
As stated by himself, and witnesses who substantially corroborate his testimony, Chapman’s case against the railway company may be condensed thus: He was driving an empty two-horse wagon, at a slow trot, eastward, on the much traveled public road from Paris to Clarksville, and Avhen about fifty feet distant (in his depositions he had said yards, but on the stand he corrects *77this and says it was feet), suddenly became aware that he was approaching a railroad crossing, not having previously known that the road crossed any railroad track. The direction of the public road and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. SympkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Norton v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Pollock v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
3Cited by18 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MageeTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- RT Herrin Petroleum Transport Co. v. ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. VoelkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.