Legal Opinion

C. A. Finch Lumber Co. v. Weishaar

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

This action was brought to recover on a promissory note. Defendant, admitting the execution and delivery of the note, pleaded failure of consideration as a defense.

The cause was tried to a jury. A verdict was returned for the defendant. At the close of the defendant’s case plaintiff moved for a directed verdict. The motion was denied. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. Judgment was entered on the verdict. Thereafter the plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The motion was denied. .Plaintiff then took this appeal from the judgment and from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Wadge v. KittlesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Longmaid v. CoulterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Mahon v. LeechNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ottow v. FrieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pear v. Grand Forks Motel AssociatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Raasch v. GouletNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Weiser v. RidgewayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Milnor Holding Co. v. HoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Sabot v. RykowskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API