Legal Opinion

B. & B. Trucking, Inc. v. Home Fire & Marine Insurance of California

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gavegan, J.:

At the time of the direction of a verdict for defendant, plaintiff moved to set it aside, and the disposition of this motion was reserved for further consideration. The final decision depends upon the sufficiency of a notice of cancellation by which the defendant insurance company purported to cancel a policy covering an automobile truck as to collision, theft or fire. Counsel for defendant has persistently diverted into questions not involved. Particularly it may be noted that we are not considering the validity of a new cancellation clause recently adopted on the recommendation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schwarzschild & Sulzberger Co. v. Phœnix InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  2. Schwarzchild & Sulzberger Co. v. Phœnix Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
  3. B. & B. Trucking, Inc. v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Naify v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. MizellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. Messing v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. National Factors, Inc. v. WatersNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Petersen v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API