Legal Opinion
Polivy v. Air One, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 9, 1997No. AC 15926PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
In this replevin action for an aircraft, the defendant Arstol, Inc. (Arstol), appeals from the judgment for the plaintiff on its counterclaim. Arstol *575claims that the trial court improperly (1) interpreted the effect of a prior trial court decision, (2) found that Arstol had not proved its conversion claim, (3) ruled on the respective repossession rights of senior and junior secured parties, (4) found that Arstol had not proved its negligence claim and (5) found that Arstol had not proved its tortious interference with a business expectancy claim. We reverse the judgment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Maroun v. TarroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Griffin v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wellington Systems, Inc. v. Redding Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Angrave v. OatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Polivy v. Air One, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997