Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Rigby

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9173PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by the appellee upon a note and mortgage executed to him by the appellants. The note, was in the words and figures following, to wit:

“$723.00. January 12th, 1872.
“ One day after date we promise to pay to the order of' Elias Rigby seven hundred and twenty-three dollars, with 10 per cent, interest, value received, without any relief from valuation or appraisement laws.

(Signed) “Harriet E. Siiaw,

“ George P. Shaw.”

The appellants severed in their defence. Harriet E. Shaw answered that, at the time she executed the note in suit, she was and since had been the wife' of her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brewster v. WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Holden v. Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Heartt v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Union Institution for Savings v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Brannon v. HursellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Seton v. HoytOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York v. Citizens Gas Co. of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. Kopelke v. KopelkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Davis v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API