Legal Opinion

Edgington v. R.G. Dickinson & Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 3, 1991No. 90-1274-CPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, District Judge.

The case comes before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion to certify their class action as maintainable pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Dk. 20). After this motion was filed, the parties conducted discovery on the issues relevant to class certification. Among those deposed were the class representatives. The parties then filed with the court their respective positions on the motion to certify. No request for an eviden-tiary hearing on the motion has been made, and the court believes one unnecessary as the parties have…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Health & Tennis Corp. of America v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  2. Emig v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  3. Harding v. Tambrands Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  4. Murray v. SevierDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API