Legal Opinion

Yowell v. MacE.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is an action instituted in June, 1925, to enjoin defendant, Constable of Spring Creek Township in the county of Phelps, from enforcing or attempting to enforce the law restraining animals from running at large as provided by Article IV of Chapter 27, Revised Statutes 1919. The sufficiency of the petition has not been challenged. A temporary injunction was granted by the judge of the Phelps county circuit court in vacation; on a trial before the Webster county circuit, to which court the cause was transferred on- a charge of venue, judgment was for defendant and a permanent injunction…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nance v. KearbeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. State ex rel. City of Memphis v. HackmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  3. State v. SearcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. State Ex Inf. Barrett v. ImhoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  5. Colter v. LukeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Felker v. City of SikestonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Granger v. ShouseDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
  3. Knechtly v. MecaskeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API