Legal Opinion

Knechtly v. Mecaskey

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1933No. 3804Published

1Opinion of the Court

BIOKLEY, Justice.

Plaintiff charged that defendant’s cattle were running at large contrary to the provisions of the 1909 herd law, in a district formed under the provisions of chapter 94, Laws 1909, and that said cattle trespassed upon plaintiff’s land situated in said district to his damage. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant, finding all the issues in favor of plaintiff. The court also made certain specific findings of fact and conclusions of law and refused requests therefor made by the defendants. Briefly, the findings are that the lands of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hayward v. GuilfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Yowell v. MacE.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Humphreys v. HumphreysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API