Legal Opinion
United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 25, 1997No. Crim. A. 91-0655 (JHG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Presently pending are the United States’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion to Dismiss”) the Claim and Petition for Remission of $263,-250.00 by Banque Indosuez as a Third Party Claimant Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(i) (“L-Claim”) and Banque Indosuez’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons expressed below, the motion to dismiss will be denied and the motion for summary judgment will be denied without prejudice. .
Background
Banque Indosuez seeks remission of $263,-250 that was forfeited pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963 when the United…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barbara Pacheco, United States of America v. John Serendensky, A/K/A John Vitolano, Joseph Foti & Guy FotiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- United States v. Zelaya RojasDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019