Shockley v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Presiding Judge.
Thomas Shockley (“Appellant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief in which he claims that he was denied effective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel. We affirm.
Appellant and his girlfriend, Janie Eas-ling (“Easling”), became stranded in North Carolina during 2000 without a car. Nancy Loudermilk (“Loudermilk”), Easling’s aunt, went to North Carolina and brought them back to Dixon, Missouri, where they began living in a mobile home on Louder-milk’s property. Eunice Blythe (“Blythe”), Loudermilk’s daughter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. LumpkinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DavidsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Coday v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. BreedloveMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Marschke v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.