Legal Opinion

Shockley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 2004No. 26132PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Presiding Judge.

Thomas Shockley (“Appellant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief in which he claims that he was denied effective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel. We affirm.

Appellant and his girlfriend, Janie Eas-ling (“Easling”), became stranded in North Carolina during 2000 without a car. Nancy Loudermilk (“Loudermilk”), Easling’s aunt, went to North Carolina and brought them back to Dixon, Missouri, where they began living in a mobile home on Louder-milk’s property. Eunice Blythe (“Blythe”), Loudermilk’s daughter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. State v. LumpkinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Coday v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. BreedloveMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Marschke v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API