Byron Borgen v. Richfield Oil Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
Appellant (sometimes herein referred to as plaintiff) sought damages in the court below for personal injuries allegedly suffered while employed as a seaman aboard the vessel S. S. David E. Day, a T-2 oil tanker owned by defendant corporation. Plaintiff relied on two causes of action — the first based on the alleged negligence of the appellee (46 U.S.C.A. § 688, commonly known as the Jones Act) and the second, in admiralty, based upon alleged unseaworthiness. There was diversity of citizenship (28 U.S.C. § 1332).
The trial was held before a jury, and at the conclusion of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Solomon Lieberman v. Matson Navigation Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Eloy Pedro Garcia v. Murphy Pacific Marine Salvaging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Hanks v. Luhr Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Hanks v. Luhr Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.