Legal Opinion

Byron Borgen v. Richfield Oil Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1958No. 15862PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

Appellant (sometimes herein referred to as plaintiff) sought damages in the court below for personal injuries allegedly suffered while employed as a seaman aboard the vessel S. S. David E. Day, a T-2 oil tanker owned by defendant corporation. Plaintiff relied on two causes of action — the first based on the alleged negligence of the appellee (46 U.S.C.A. § 688, commonly known as the Jones Act) and the second, in admiralty, based upon alleged unseaworthiness. There was diversity of citizenship (28 U.S.C. § 1332).

The trial was held before a jury, and at the conclusion of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Solomon Lieberman v. Matson Navigation Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Eloy Pedro Garcia v. Murphy Pacific Marine Salvaging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Hanks v. Luhr Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Hanks v. Luhr Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API