Hanks v. Luhr Bros., Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn
Any seaman hurt on the job can sue for damages and, at his election, have a jury decide the outcome. 46 U.S.C. app. § 688 (1994). When Congress passed the Jones Act, it made trial by jury a matter for the seaman to decide. Congress wanted the seaman’s employer to abide by that decision. Allen v. Norman Brothers, Inc., 286 Ill. App. 3d 1091, 678 N.E.2d 317 (1997).
Here, a Jones Act plaintiff wanted the judge rather than a jury to decide his case. Luhr Brothers, Inc. (Luhr), wanted a jury to decide it. The judge struck Luhr’s jury demand and heard the case. He found for plaintiff and awarded…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Charles D. Gautreaux v. Scurlock Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bowman v. American River Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Hendricks v. Riverway Harbor Service St. Louis, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Bowman v. American River Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Bowman v. American River Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Hendricks v. Riverway Harbor Service St. Louis, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.