Legal Opinion

Yellowstone-Merchants' Nat. Bank v. Rosenbaum Bros. & Co.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided January 9, 1922No. 975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Taw. Action by the Yeliowstone-Merchants’ National Bank of Billings against Rosenbaum Bros. & Co.

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff is a national bank of this state, and defendant is a corporation of Illinois. The action in trover was brought in a state court, process was served in this state upon defendant’s president, defendant appeared specially to quash and dismiss and to remove the cause hither, and also appeared specially herein to quash, and plaintiff appeared specially to remand.

Plaintiff’s contention is that, since defendant insists it was not legally served with process, and is not subject to process in this state, for that it is in no respect to be found in it, the action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Nickels v. Pullman Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
  2. Trower v. Stonebraker-Zea Live Stock Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Hager v. New York Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1927
  4. Dulion v. Lynch Enterprise Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. O. M. Spratt Corp. v. Public Utilities Consol. Corp.District Court, D. Montana · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API