Legal Opinion
Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 30, 2015No. 12-488CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contract Disputes Act; Commercial Real Estate Brokerage Agreement; Extension Clause; Real Estate Leases; Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2); Breach of Contract; Damages Equaling Brokerage Commissions On Transactions That Occurred After Brokerage Agreement Was Terminated; Expectation Damages; Market Rate for Real Estate Brokerage Commissions.
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Plaintiff, The Meyer Group, Ltd. (“Meyer Group”), claims that the Government, through the Postal Regulatory Commission (“PRC”) breached an exclusive real estate brokerage agreement (“Agreement’-’) by refusing to recognize…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dms Imaging, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Dms Imaging, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- GEBROE-HAMMER ASSOCIATES VS. DEAL LAKE VILLAGE GARDENS, LLC VS. 406 DEAL LAKE, LLC, VS. BRAD SMITH (L-1437-16, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020