Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Whitney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1985No. 83-2670PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Per curiam

Bartolo Gomez, Sr. and his family brought a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Winslow and its employees Walter Maulé, Sterling Norgaard and Frank Kramer. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on the grounds that the statute of limitations had run on the plaintiffs’ claims and that the plaintiffs failed to state a cognizable § 1983 claim. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, Lone Ranger Television, Inc. v. Program Radio Corp., 740 F.2d 718, 720 (9th Cir.1984), and affirm.

Appellants’ son, Bartolo Gomez, Jr., who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Arthur F. Smith, Jr. v. Max RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  3. Lone Ranger Television, Inc. v. Program Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Crowder v. SinyardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. Gomez v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Lewis v. GallivanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
  4. Estate of Cartwright v. City of Concord, Cal.District Court, N.D. California · 1985
  5. Greg Scher Mark Power v. Chief Postal Inspector B.J. Powers Brian Begley Will Stinson Agent De Bourge Mike Eaves 1-25 DoesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API