Legal Opinion

Arthur F. Smith, Jr. v. Max Ross

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1973No. 73-1237PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants brought this action for damages under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3) (1970) against the Sheriff of Marion County, Ohio, his deputy, his bonding company, and the mayor and city council of Prospect, Ohio. The amended complaint asserted that appellants were two members of an interracial four-piece musical band that had rented a building in Prospect on August 27, 1970, from one Jack Schmittauer to use for rehearsal purposes. It charged that on September 2, 1970, deputy Schei-derer told appellants’ landlord that he would have to evict them because black residents were not welcome in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bible Believers v. Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. Marjorie Glasson v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Jackson v. City of JolietCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Gerald C. Bruner, Cross-Appellant v. Wade Dunaway, Cross-Appellees, James Bates, Gregory Taylor, Christian CastellawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API