Elaine Christensen, Orville Brown, Doran Pete and Gladys Walker v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
The appellants filed this action seeking monetary and injunctive relief against the United States based on the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ failure to provide the appellants access to an Indian land allotment. The district court entered summary judgment for the United States on the ground that the appellants’ claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Christensen v. United States, 583 F.Supp. 1539 (D.Nev.1984). We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
The appellants are four American Indians who claim an undivided interest in an Indian allotment originally issued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Santiago Amaro v. The Continental Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Arenas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lee O. Edwards, Jr. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 36, Building Material and Dump Truck DriversCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Robert A. Walters v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Louis John Ippolito, Michael Contino, Irving Schwartz, William Darnold, Lawrence Miller, Thomas Arrants, and Arthur Joseph NatoliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Daniel J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Lynn Dale Bogart, Edward Elbert Wingender, Teodaro Risquez, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Calvin Geyen, Jr. v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.