Legal Opinion
Padilla v. Triple-S, Inc.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided July 30, 2007No. Civil 07-1246 (DRD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
DOMINGUEZ, District Judge.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The instant case is a breach of contract claim arising under the Employee Retire ment Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et. seq., brought by Luis Diaz Padilla against Triple-S Inc. Plaintiff seeks injunctive and equitable relief, specific performance and damages for Defendant’s refusal to cover Plaintiffs desired INTACS procedure under his ERISA-regulated insurance plan. Plaintiff is insured under a health benefit plan sponsored by his employer, COSTCO, and Triple-S is the health insurer of that group health plan. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Isner v. MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009