Legal Opinion

Isner v. MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 22, 2009No. Civil 08-13417PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOHN FEIKENS, District Judge.

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). There are two pending motions to dismiss this case, one filed by Defendant Minnesota Life Insurance Company (“Minnesota Life”), and one filed by Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America (“Unum”) (Dkt. 24 & 25). Magistrate Judge Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation on September 23, 2009 (the “Report”) (Dkt. 36). The Report recommends dismissing the Complaint against both Defendants for failure to state…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Renfro v. Funky Door Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Jeff Renfro v. Unum Life Insurance Company OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API