State v. Foster
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.:
{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals from the order of the trial court that suppressed evidence obtained during a warrantless search of Valinton Foster's ("Foster") vehicle. The state assigns the following error for our review:
The trial court erred in granting [Foster's] motion to suppress physical evidence and statements because the police conducted an inventory search of a closed container in good faith and pursuant to a standardized and written policy.
{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we agree with the trial court's conclusion that the state's search…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FinfrockOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. NixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023