Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 2017No. 104809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.:

{¶ 1} The state of Ohio appeals from the order of the trial court that suppressed evidence obtained during a warrantless search of Valinton Foster's ("Foster") vehicle. The state assigns the following error for our review:

The trial court erred in granting [Foster's] motion to suppress physical evidence and statements because the police conducted an inventory search of a closed container in good faith and pursuant to a standardized and written policy.

{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we agree with the trial court's conclusion that the state's search…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FinfrockOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. NixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API